Why the Job Recovery is a Farce.
The Labor Force Participation Rates Among Various Age Groups Show Serious Weakness in the Labor Market.
The main stream media has been trumpeting the wonderful state of the U.S. labor market.
Superlatives like “Robust” “Buoyant” “Solid” “Strengthening” are used to describe the job market.
But….
The Job Recovery is a Farce
Here’s Why:
Non Farm Payroll/Unemployment Rate
The strong top line non farm payroll numbers and the lower unemployment rate (5.5%!) recently reported by the United States Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) do not reflect accurately the health of the labor market or the overall economy.
The lack of wage growth, part time nature of many of the newly created jobs and a declining labor participation rate paint a more accurate picture.
The False Job Recovery
While main stream media stories herald a “job led recovery” an examination of details behind the labor participation rate published by the BLS show a weak labor market.
Here is a chart of the labor participation rate since 1978. You can see it is at thirty six year low levels.
Labor Force Participation Rate 1978-2015
Is the declining labor participation rate a function of retiring baby boomers?
Under this theory proffered by none other than Fed Chair Janet Yellen and the White House, a decline in the labor force participation rate is to be expected as baby boomers have begun to retire.
In a “solid” job market, however, one would expect that younger workers would take the places of retiring baby boomers and the labor participation among these workers would be increasing.
It’s not.
The labor participation rate among 16-19 years is lower today than when the Great Recession officially ended in June 2009.
Labor Force Participation Rate 2008-2015 Among 16-19 Year Olds
Perhaps the 16-19 year old age bracket is too young a group from which to draw a meaningful conclusion about the labor force participation rate. How about those that are 20-24 years old? Surely, since the recession officially ended there must be an increase in the labor force participation rate for this group.
There isn’t.
Labor Force Participation Rate 2008-2015 Among 20-24 Year Olds
Those aged 20-24 might still be in college. Certainly, in such a “robust” job market, recent college graduates in their twenties and those in their thirties, forties and early fifities (the prime earning years, the ones where people form households and buy homes) must be attached to the labor force in increasing percentages.
Nope!
Labor Force Participation Rate 2008-2015 Among 25-54 Year Olds
But where is that buyoant economic recovery with the robust job growth you read about in Reuters?
HERE is where the labor participation rate has grown since the beginning of the Great Recession:
Labor Force Participation Rate 2008-2015 Among Those 55 Years and Older
The growth in the labor participation rate is even more pronounced among those aged 65 years and older.
Labor Force Participation Rate 2008-2015 Among Those Aged 65 and Older Without Disabilities
Quantitative easing and artificially low interest rates have not helped to create jobs, but rather have acted as a stimulus for some companies to fire workers so they can free up cash to buy back their own shares.
Low interest rates have forced older workers to remain in or return to the labor force because they can no longer retire on fixed income securities like certificates of deposits as they pay next to no interest. These older workers often compete for jobs with younger workers.
While just about all major economic data releases the past few months have shown little, no or negative growth, the increase in non farm payroll jobs is clearly an outlier and the concept of a job recovery a farce.
Job market is "robust" "solid" while construction, industrial production,factory orders, wages, home, car & retail sales flat or down?
— Smaulgld (@Smaulgld) March 8, 2015